3D Framework
Overview
Framework Customer Story
CIMdata e-Book
MBD Utilities
Validate
Revision
View/Convert
Customer Stories
CAD Data Risks Whitepaper
Focus: Aerospace
KeyCreator CAD
Meet KeyCreator
What Is Direct Modeling
KeyCreator Reviews
KeyCreator Customer Stories
Focus: Drafting
Schools & Students
CKD Viewer
About
Company
International Resellers
All Customer Stories
Referral Program
Partners
News
Blog
Contact
Store
Revision/Validate
View/Convert
KeyCreator CAD
Shopping Cart
Support
Login
Software
Users
Submit Request
Remote Assist
Forum
Kubotek University
Help
Kubotek Forum
KeyCreator CAD & CKD Viewer
Technical discussion of CAD/CAM and integrated partner products
Customer Forum
>
KeyCreator CAD & CKD Viewer
>
Are they finally serious about "interoperability"?
View modes:
View mode
Threaded
Flat - newest to oldest
Flat - oldest to newest
Valued member
Lardo
-
5/2/2016 3:17:39 PM
Are they finally serious about "interoperability"?
Just came across this in the latest edition of Desktop Engineering.
http://www.deskeng.com/de/its-high-time-for-cad-interoperability/
Okay, so Autodesk & Siemens are collaborating on an interoperability solution. But then again... are they really? Will there solution work with files from ALL the other CAD vendors? Or will it only allow "interoperability" between Autodesk & Siemens files?
Quoted from the article; "The idea is to infuse interoperability across a range of products BETWEEN THE TWO SOFTWARE LEADERS...." (emphasis mine)
Sounds to me like Autodesk and Siemens are trying to "gang up" on, rather than work with, their competition. If they really cared about true interoperability, they'd adopt an attitude similar to KeyCreator. Where imported files, regardless of where they come from, are treated as native.
When are engineers and designers going to quit buying into the "hype and glitter" from the "software leaders", and turn to the tools that work... direct modeling?
Reply
|
Quote
|
Subscribe to post
Valued member
dubledeuce@earthlink.net
-
6/6/2016 7:24:01 PM
RE:Are they finally serious about "interoperability"?
Market leaders in the Cad field have a significanly investment in the 'tree' system. As such it doesn't do thier marketing team a great deal of good the hear ANYTHING about the advantages of direct modeling. Big corp LIKES to be sold on BIG ideas. "More be better" is the prevailing theme. Also, treee based software keeps the management in the loop of design by artificially setting up operational barriers to anyone attempting to make radical changes to the model. To make a SIGNIFICANT change to any model without the OK and or acquiencennce of management is blasphemous.
Couple the investment, the tie in of the Keys to the Kingdom, and the long established NIH (not invented here) syndrom and you have an industry locked into its own demise-demise here being the inability to dominate the market by product inovation.
Now comes this "Industry Collabration" called "Interoperbility" (didn't I see that term on an old CADKEY 19 box once?) dressed up as the lastest industry buzz word and all iI see is a thicker layer of code overwritten onto the collaborators product to devise some inter-corporate method to 'standardize" the bidniz-THEIR bidniz.
I think Key Creator had the right product but they for SOME reason do not have the keys to the marketing lock to give them more exposure. Time and again I have been in mixed company and raised the conversation of using KEYCreator and all I get are dumb stares.
After an explaination I get a polite 'Whatever" and the conversation goes back to Solid Works or AutoDesk and their established standards. The standards DO NOT belong to them save for the fact that the arrogance of these manufactures permits them to call a standard like AutoCAD DXF and AutoCAD DWG.
If this standards business is to have any legs I think Kubotek needs to up their exposure in the field of product placement. Start young and get them started on the silplicity of the concept then let the other guys play catch up ball as to wanting to complicate the system with THEIR standard.
Leadership gentlemen, taht is the secret.
As usual, CADFuzed.
Reply
|
Quote
|
Subscribe to post
Valued member
Lardo
-
6/7/2016 4:35:16 AM
RE:Are they finally serious about "interoperability"?
When I tried to explain KeyCreator, to a Solidwrecks lemming one time, the response I got was, "But you have to have parametrics." When I asked why he told me, "Because you have too."
Well okay then. How can anyone argue with that kind of reasoning?
Reply
|
Quote
|
Subscribe to post
Valued member
Manolo
-
6/7/2016 12:48:14 PM
RE:Are they finally serious about "interoperability"?
Parametric softwares are 2.5D, they get a 3D solid but in a primitive way.
They do not understand that KC does not need save planes and sketches in a structured tree, KC is beyond of their mental capacity.
Reply
|
Quote
|
Subscribe to post
Valued member
Lardo
-
6/7/2016 1:02:04 PM
RE:Are they finally serious about "interoperability"?
And what's worse.... the don't want to understand. Ignorance is bliss.
Reply
|
Quote
|
Subscribe to post
1
Login