3D Framework
Overview
Framework Customer Story
CIMdata e-Book
MBD Utilities
Validate
Revision
View/Convert
Customer Stories
CAD Data Risks Whitepaper
Focus: Aerospace
KeyCreator CAD
Meet KeyCreator
What Is Direct Modeling
KeyCreator Reviews
KeyCreator Customer Stories
Focus: Drafting
Schools & Students
CKD Viewer
About
Company
International Resellers
All Customer Stories
Referral Program
Partners
News
Blog
Contact
Store
Revision/Validate
View/Convert
KeyCreator CAD
Shopping Cart
Support
Login
Software
Users
Submit Request
Remote Assist
Forum
Kubotek University
Help
Kubotek Forum
KeyCreator CAD & CKD Viewer
Technical discussion of CAD/CAM and integrated partner products
Customer Forum
>
KeyCreator CAD & CKD Viewer
>
workstation and GPU recommendations
View modes:
View mode
Threaded
Flat - newest to oldest
Flat - oldest to newest
Member
Yigal D
-
8/11/2020 10:04:48 AM
workstation and GPU recommendations
Hello
I need to buy a new pc for for using Keycreator.
I saw the recommended system (NVIDIA, 1GB memory or better),
and wanted to know if there is any benefit in using an Nvidia Quadro card?
In general, the common concept is that Quadro cards are better for 3D modeling than GeoForce (GF) cards.
But I found an old article (from 2010) in KC blog that compares between QUADRO and GF cards when using KC.
part 1
part 2
The main conclusion from this article,
is that there isn't any benefit in
spending 650$ more on
quadro card
although it showed better performance.
Since this article is 10 years old, and the GPU technology changed, and probably some things in KC also changed regarding the GPU, I don't know if today this conclusion is still the same.
Does anyone here know / checked / compared different cards?
For example: at the same price I can buy QUADRO P2200 with 5 GB RAM, or RTX 2060S with 8 GB RAM that have much better performance in many different workbench comparisons. But all of those comparisons are based on different games and not on 3D design.
My main usage of KC is for machine building.
I design different machine parts, and combine them with other parts such as: engines, cylinders and etc.
A typical large project that I have, is an assembly with several sub-assemblies, that contain : 122 solids and 44 part references. the size of the file is about 15MB.
Thanks in advance
Uri
Reply
|
Quote
|
Subscribe to post
Advanced member
michael@gutmandesign.com
-
8/12/2020 1:35:23 PM
RE:workstation and GPU recommendations
Hi Uri,
I just opened a 360 meg solid (no references) and am able to smoothly and rapidly rotate it on the screen Also tried it with transparency and there was no change in performance.
My card is a GeForce GTX1070 and it is a few years old. The system is an I7 "gaming" computer with 32gig memory (maxed it out) and Win 10 home edition. No SSD but the next computer will have it. Total cost with extra ram was about $13-1400.
KC does not seem to be very demanding on computing hardware.
The use of references in your assembly files will keep performance up.
Hope this helps and good luck with your new computer,
Mike
Reply
|
Quote
|
Subscribe to post
Member
Yigal D
-
8/12/2020 5:36:23 PM
RE:workstation and GPU recommendations
Hi Mike
Thanks for your answer.
Uri
Reply
|
Quote
|
Subscribe to post
1
Login