Kubotek Forum

Chris with all due respect , I think we as maintenance users should have more of a voice and a voice that deserves response and followup. How can KC determine if it will benefit the majority of users - if users dont have access to these requests ??

 Should not engagement include improvement??  I am a strong advocate for KC  Love the program - have recently become a Beta tester - However all I ask is we have a better way to ask for and follow up on request enhancements.

 I think most users " requests" would deal with the core product of KC as a design tool - not fluff.
 Fluff looks pretty but it doesnt get the job done.